Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
The practice of barristers wearing traditional horsehair wigs in English courts is under review. Some believe the wigs are culturally insensitive, and are advocating for a change in this longstanding legal tradition. The wig, introduced in the 17th century, has long been a symbol of legal dignity and authority.
The argument against its usage comes at a time of increased awareness about symbols and practices that may marginalize particular racial or cultural groups. Critics suggest that the wig is representative of a colonial past that is not reflective of modern multicultural Britain.
Despite these concerns, many barristers argue that wearing the wigs fosters an atmosphere of formality and respect within the court system, and some point out how it can act as a leveler, affording a degree of anonymity to the lawyer and reducing potential bias.
The views on this tradition are divided, suggesting that any decision to ax the wig will possibly be a matter of considerable debate within the legal profession.
The English courts are yet to make a final decision on this matter.